|
hahah, lol
Well Joseph, I'm not quite through with the whole LVS-NAT idea just yet,
been a busy day, debating Databases damn near all day long, MySQL vs. Oracle
vs. PostGreSQL...... All I can say is, MySQL may not be as functional, but
it sure as hell is gonna be easier to cluster, not to mention cheaper.
Haven't got to play with the LVS yet, but I intend on dedicated a solid 4
hours to trying to get LVS to work with NAT before abandoning all hope and
moving on the LVS-DR, as I'm not to keep on the so called. "ARP problem."
Will keep you posted,
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Mack" <mack@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Michael McConnell" <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Horms" <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: my progress
> On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, Michael McConnell wrote:
>
> > Just a though, clarifying that in the Howto might be a good idea, or
maybe
> > I'm just ignorant (-:
>
> it's fixed in the pending version. There is no need for this to happen to
> anyone else.
>
> Actually, we should have waited a bit to straighten you out - at least
> till you'd figured out virtual hosting on VS-NAT. That would have made a
> great question for the next trivia quiz :-)
>
>
> Joe
>
> --
> Joseph Mack mack@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
|
