LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: my progress

To: "Horms" <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: my progress
Cc: <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Michael McConnell" <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 12:23:25 -0700
well then, if I don't have to do dramatic reconfiguration, or ANY
reconfiguration of the physical systems, then Direct Routing it is! I'm off
to explorer the new world of direct routing.

Just a though, clarifying that in the Howto might be a good idea, or maybe
I'm just ignorant (-:

Thanks for all the info so far. (-:

Mike

----- Original Message -----
From: "Horms" <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Michael McConnell" <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 11:00 AM
Subject: Re: my progress


> On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 10:56:25AM -0700, Michael McConnell wrote:
> > So what your saying is, they can actually go into a hub, they just can't
be
> > routed?
> > I've attached a little diagram, can you tell me if this little picture
would
> > work for Direct Routing? (yahh visio)
> >
> > I had been under the impression that they either had to be connected via
a
> > Coax Cable, or a Cross over connection going from NIC to NIC.
>
> What you have is fine, as you say they just need to be not routed. Having
> Coax, Switched or non-Switched cat 5 or fibre is fine.
>
> --
> Horms
>
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>