LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: High Availability

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: High Availability
From: Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 11:30:26 +0200
On 2002-04-16T14:52:30,
   hrishi-seipl <hrishi@xxxxxxxxx> said:

Please fix your line lengths; your lines should not be longer than 70-78
characters.

> Hi,
> 
>  I am trying the same thing. The problem I am facing is that when the second
>  load balancer takes over the virtual Ip of the first loadbalancer using
>  heartbeat ( after the the first load balancer goes down) , the second load
>  balancer does not however takeover the inside private ip of the first load
>  balancer which the load balancer uses to cummunicate with the realservers
>  on the inside private network.This is problematic because the realservers
>  have been configured to have the internal private ip of the first load
>  balancer as their default gateway . (which is necessary for  LVS_NAT.) 
> 
> Is there a way that the realsevers can have two gateways one having internal
> ip of first load balancer and the second  having internal Ip of second load
> balancer. This way when first load balancer and hence the first gateway goes
> down they will try the second gateway belonging to second director.

You are trying to cure the sympton, not the cause ;-)

Why haven't you configured your LVS system to also takeover the internal IP?


Sincerely,
    Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@xxxxxxx>

-- 
Immortality is an adequate definition of high availability for me.
        --- Gregory F. Pfister



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>