Re: [rfc 0/3] IPVS: checksum updates

To: "Simon Horman" <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [rfc 0/3] IPVS: checksum updates
Cc: lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Siim Põder" <siim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Julian Anastasov" <ja@xxxxxx>, "Malcolm Turnbull" <malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Vince Busam" <vbusam@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Herbert Xu" <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Julius Volz" <juliusv@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 15:12:39 +0200
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 02:14:12PM +0200, Julius Volz wrote:
>> I'm actually looking at that case now (4856c84c1358b, but with the fix
>> above). It seems that the NAT isn't working (DR works, by the way!).
>> At least the first packet arriving at the real server still has the
>> client's IP as the source (in the v6 case)...
> Ok, I'm looking at NAT with 4856c84c1358b + that fix too too,
> but on v4 :-)
>> Let's wait with reverting the local client patches until tomorrow...
>> maybe I can find the problem until then.
> Ok, I was just concerned that this might hold up merging
> your code into Dave's tree for too long, thats all.

Ok, with my last patch (and your two/three last ones reverted), I get
everything working except IPv6 with a local client...


Julius Volz - Corporate Operations - SysOps

Google Switzerland GmbH - Identification No.: CH-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>