Re: [rfc 0/3] IPVS: checksum updates

To: "Simon Horman" <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [rfc 0/3] IPVS: checksum updates
Cc: lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Siim Põder" <siim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Julian Anastasov" <ja@xxxxxx>, "Malcolm Turnbull" <malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Vince Busam" <vbusam@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Herbert Xu" <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Julius Volz" <juliusv@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 15:42:17 +0200
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 03:12:39PM +0200, Julius Volz wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 02:14:12PM +0200, Julius Volz wrote:
>> >> I'm actually looking at that case now (4856c84c1358b, but with the fix
>> >> above). It seems that the NAT isn't working (DR works, by the way!).
>> >> At least the first packet arriving at the real server still has the
>> >> client's IP as the source (in the v6 case)...
>> >
>> > Ok, I'm looking at NAT with 4856c84c1358b + that fix too too,
>> > but on v4 :-)
>> >
>> >> Let's wait with reverting the local client patches until tomorrow...
>> >> maybe I can find the problem until then.
>> >
>> > Ok, I was just concerned that this might hold up merging
>> > your code into Dave's tree for too long, thats all.
>> Ok, with my last patch (and your two/three last ones reverted), I get
>> everything working except IPv6 with a local client...
> Ok, that is good news :-)
> Sorry for the stuff up. That bugus ip_route_me_harder() call
> was caused by me trying to merge the IPv6 patches with the local
> client patches.

No problem!

> I'm not so concerned about IPv6 local not working for now -
> its a combination of two new features. And hopefully we
> can iron it out in the not to distant future anyway.

Yes, probably just some minor bug...

> I'll drop CSUM2/3 and 3/3 for now, they aren't essential and
> it really ought to be a matter of (me) sitting down and fixing
> some correctness issues.


> Its the end of my day now. I'll try and update lvs-next-2.6 into
> a working state in the morning.

Yes, let's stabilize it a bit... have a nice evening!


Julius Volz - Corporate Operations - SysOps

Google Switzerland GmbH - Identification No.: CH-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>