Re: [rfc 0/3] IPVS: checksum updates

To: Julius Volz <juliusv@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [rfc 0/3] IPVS: checksum updates
Cc: lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Siim Põder <siim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>, Malcolm Turnbull <malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Vince Busam <vbusam@xxxxxxxxxx>, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 09:22:06 +1000
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 05:32:47PM +0200, Julius Volz wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Julius Volz <juliusv@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> I'm not so concerned about IPv6 local not working for now -
> >> its a combination of two new features. And hopefully we
> >> can iron it out in the not to distant future anyway.
> >
> > Yes, probably just some minor bug...
> Actually, it wasn't even a kernel bug, but a configuration error - I
> was using LVS/NAT, but still had the dummy0 interface with the IPv6
> VIP configured on the real server (from the DR case). And in the local
> client case, the source address is the VIP, so the real server just
> delivered the response to itself.
> Now I can confirm that everything is working (without your last two
> patches and with the one removing the wrong ip_route_me_harder)!

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>