Re: [rfc 0/3] IPVS: checksum updates

To: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [rfc 0/3] IPVS: checksum updates
Cc: Julius Volz <juliusv@xxxxxxxxxx>, lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Vince Busam <vbusam@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: Wensong Zhang <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 21:07:22 +0800
Simon Horman wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 07:30:52PM +0200, Julius Volz wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 11:30:29AM +0200, Julius Volz wrote:
Great, thanks! I have tested TCP+UDP, local+remote clients, v4+v6,
NAT+DSR+TUN in all combinations that are expected to be working and
found no problems.
Thanks once again for your testing. I'll send a pull request to Dave in
the morning.
Thanks very much!

(CC: Wensong)
I guess it would make sense to start hosting the new ipvsadm version
somewhere on soon. It could still
be marked as unstable and saying, "If you intend to use the
experimental IPv6 support for IPVS introduced in kernel 2.6.XX, you
will need this new version of ipvsadm: ...". Also, we can then point
to it in the Kconfig help text in CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6. What do you

Yes I agree. It would be good to start hosting tarballs of the
new/unstable/experimental version of ipvsadm on

Wensong, can we also host some sort of repository for ipvsadm on If not, I guess the next most logical choice
would be to use

Hi Horms and Julius,

I have created a svn repository for ipvsadm at before, will create the check-in accounts for you right now.



To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>