|
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 11:30:29AM +0200, Julius Volz wrote:
>> Great, thanks! I have tested TCP+UDP, local+remote clients, v4+v6,
>> NAT+DSR+TUN in all combinations that are expected to be working and
>> found no problems.
>
> Thanks once again for your testing. I'll send a pull request to Dave in
> the morning.
Thanks very much!
(CC: Wensong)
I guess it would make sense to start hosting the new ipvsadm version
somewhere on http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ soon. It could still
be marked as unstable and saying, "If you intend to use the
experimental IPv6 support for IPVS introduced in kernel 2.6.XX, you
will need this new version of ipvsadm: ...". Also, we can then point
to it in the Kconfig help text in CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6. What do you
think?
Julius
--
Julius Volz - Corporate Operations - SysOps
Google Switzerland GmbH - Identification No.: CH-020.4.028.116-1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|
