Re: [rfc 0/3] IPVS: checksum updates

To: "Simon Horman" <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [rfc 0/3] IPVS: checksum updates
Cc: lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Siim Põder" <siim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Julian Anastasov" <ja@xxxxxx>, "Malcolm Turnbull" <malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Vince Busam" <vbusam@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Herbert Xu" <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Julius Volz" <juliusv@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 17:32:47 +0200
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Julius Volz <juliusv@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I'm not so concerned about IPv6 local not working for now -
>> its a combination of two new features. And hopefully we
>> can iron it out in the not to distant future anyway.
> Yes, probably just some minor bug...

Actually, it wasn't even a kernel bug, but a configuration error - I
was using LVS/NAT, but still had the dummy0 interface with the IPv6
VIP configured on the real server (from the DR case). And in the local
client case, the source address is the VIP, so the real server just
delivered the response to itself.

Now I can confirm that everything is working (without your last two
patches and with the one removing the wrong ip_route_me_harder)!


Julius Volz - Corporate Operations - SysOps

Google Switzerland GmbH - Identification No.: CH-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>