LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] Re: IPVS Benchmarking

To: Julian Anastasov <uli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Re: IPVS Benchmarking
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Joseph Mack <mack@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2000 08:52:57 -0500 (EST)
On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, Julian Anastasov wrote:

> > Do you know if a 100Mpbs NIC is supposed to be able to receive at 100Mbps
> > at the same time as it is sending 100Mpbs? Does an 8-port switch have 4
> > pairs of connections in both directions at 100Mbps (total 800Mpbs) or only
> > 4 connections with each connection being in 1 direction (total 400Mbps)?
> 
>       I know that usually the default setting for the cards is
> "autoselect" but if the autonegotiation is not possible it can be forced
> via module option. You can check your driver for more info and to inspect
> the driver output with dmesg.

it says "full duplex"


>       When using full duplex LAN switch the collisions are not detected
> from the card and theoretically it is possible to be achieved 2x100Mbps
> per each connected to the switch card: 100Mbps in and 100Mbps out. 

OK good to know.

> From
> the results I assume that your cards are in full duplex mode, i.e. 120Mbps
> input+output. What speed shows a ftp transfer on idle machines: ~11MB/s ?
> Get the result from the second test, i.e. we want the transferred file to 
> be in the cache. 

yes I understand the role of the cache. must do this test too.

> The 3th test can be ftp in both directions to test the
> full duplex speed between two hosts. 

I assume that's 2 client windows, one uploading, one downloading

(will reply to your "hints" sometime)

Joe

--
Joseph Mack mack@xxxxxxxxxxx


----------------------------------------------------------------------
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lvs-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: lvs-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>