|
Hello,
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Joseph Mack wrote:
> Here is yesterday's table with an extra column added, the direct
> connection from client to director (c-d). It would seem that you can't get
> get more than 100Mbps through a single cable (the connection from client
> to director) with netpipe. The director was heavily loaded in this test
> (load average >4) for 6 connections, since it has to generate the replies.
> By comparison when configured for VS-DR, the director has little load.
Yes, in VS/NAT mode the director forwards the answers from the
real servers.
>
> I will redo the tests that give results >100Mbps. I am beginning to think
> that netpipe may not be a good test - each window is sending its packet
> and measuring the throughput for its packet. If because of contention for
> resources, a netpipe process has to wait before starting to send a packet
> and this wait is not included in the timing, then the measured throughput
> will be higher than the real throughput. I will write to the netpipe
> person and ask about this.
>
> In the meantime I will try the tests with ftp and measure the total
> time.
OK. You can try direct FTP test and ftp test through the VS or
just using standard MASQ module. By this way we can compare VS/NAT with
standard MASQ. You can try GET and PUT commands.
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <uli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lvs-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: lvs-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
