LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: IPVS Benchmarking

To: Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IPVS Benchmarking
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Julian Anastasov <uli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 18:48:18 +0200 (EET)
        Hi,

On Sun, 9 Jan 2000, Horms wrote:

> This may be a silly question, but other than using NAT, which has
> performance problems, is this possible. I tried this topology
> with direct routing and packets from the clients were multiplexed
> to the servers fine, but return packets from the servers to the
> client were not routed by the IPVS box.

        Why do you think that NAT is so slow? Any benchmarks?

Regards,

Julian Anastasov


----------------------------------------------------------------------
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lvs-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: lvs-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>