On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 06:48:18PM +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 9 Jan 2000, Horms wrote:
>
> > This may be a silly question, but other than using NAT, which has
> > performance problems, is this possible. I tried this topology
> > with direct routing and packets from the clients were multiplexed
> > to the servers fine, but return packets from the servers to the
> > client were not routed by the IPVS box.
>
> Why do you think that NAT is so slow? Any benchmarks?
Not yet, I am hoping to be able to get some numbers next week.
--
Horms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lvs-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: lvs-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|