|
you should be fine with all of those services. i've never tried it with
imap, but i don't see why it would be an issue.
what you may need to look out for is any ident lookups that your
mailservices may need to do or respond to, as those get weird from reports
i've seen on this list. there's some sendmail option to get around that
but i forget what. the qmail/tcpserver workaround is to use tcpserver's
-R option. etc...
-tcl.
On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Jason Smith wrote:
> Ok I have read through a bit of the documentation and the mail list . . .
>
> BUT before I really get started with this project I need to make sure my
> idea is valid . . .
>
> I am involved in maintaing a service that currently supports about 20,000
> email users . . . new email users are being added at a rate of about 150
> people per day . . . currently the server is starting to feel the effects,
> but it does have some room to grow (2nd CPU, more RAM, etc) . . . but I want
> to maintain a lead time WAY ahead of the email resource curve . . .
>
> The services we want to provide are POP, IMAP, and web based retrival of
> email . . . and of course also provide web and ftp services utilizing a
> cluster . . . I know the www and ftp issues are well covered (they are
> discussed in the docs I have read) . . . but can LVS handle any type TCP
> connection? such as IMAP and POP? . . . (given the users email directory
> only resides in one common directory via NFS or some such solution) . . .
>
> Is this a valid situation to implement LVS?
>
> More to the point . . . is anyone currently providing such services and if
> so can you please provide a few pointers, things to watch out for, issues???
>
> Thanks
> JX
> -out
>
>
>
>
|
