solid.
the goal of course is to allow the real servers to be internal for large
cluster and not wasting ip space.
-jeremy
>
> i believe using unroutable/internal ips is fine for the "real" ips of the
> real servers, but they need to be able to contact the client machine
> directly, ie: have an outgoing gateway route to the "real" internet.
>
> i may be missing something.
>
> client
> |
> |
> v
> director VIP (eth0)
> 192.168.123.9 (eth1)
> |
> |
> v
> real server 192.168.123.11 (eth0)
> (VIP on hidden interface/whatever)
> |
> |
> v
> gateway 192.168.123.1 (eth1)
> re.al.i.p (eth0)
> allow 192.168.123.11 to forward through here...
> |
> |
> v
> back to client.
>
> right?
>
> -tcl.
>
>
> On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Jeremy Hansen wrote:
>
> >
> > In a direct routing situation, do the real server needs to be
> > routable? Or only point their loopback to the routable vip on the lvs
> > machine? I've setup dr fine, but never using internals on the real
> > servers.
> >
> > Thanks
> > -jeremy
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.xxedgexx.com | jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > ---------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
--
http://www.xxedgexx.com | jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------------
|