LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: lvs and direct routing question...does the real server have to be ro

To: tc lewis <tcl@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: lvs and direct routing question...does the real server have to be routable?
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Jeremy Hansen <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 16:47:22 -0400 (EDT)
solid.

the goal of course is to allow the real servers to be internal for large
cluster and not wasting ip space.

-jeremy

> 
> i believe using unroutable/internal ips is fine for the "real" ips of the
> real servers, but they need to be able to contact the client machine
> directly, ie: have an outgoing gateway route to the "real" internet.
> 
> i may be missing something.
> 
> client
>  |
>  |
>  v
> director VIP (eth0)
>          192.168.123.9 (eth1)
>  |
>  |
>  v
> real server 192.168.123.11 (eth0)
>             (VIP on hidden interface/whatever)
>  |
>  |
>  v
> gateway 192.168.123.1 (eth1)
>         re.al.i.p (eth0)
>         allow 192.168.123.11 to forward through here...
>  |
>  |
>  v
> back to client.
> 
> right?
> 
> -tcl.
> 
> 
> On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Jeremy Hansen wrote:
> 
> > 
> > In a direct routing situation, do the real server needs to be
> > routable?  Or only point their loopback to the routable vip on the lvs
> > machine?  I've setup dr fine, but never using internals on the real
> > servers.
> > 
> > Thanks
> > -jeremy
> > 
> > -- 
> > 
> > http://www.xxedgexx.com | jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > ---------------------------------------------
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 

-- 

http://www.xxedgexx.com | jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------------



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>