|
I think I'll just patch the kernel -- then I don't have to worry about it at
all!
-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Mack [mailto:mack@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 6:50 AM
To: Jon Oringer
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: ARP problem - do I have to deal with it in my case?
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, Jon Oringer wrote:
> Do I still have to deal with the ARP problem?
yes, but you don't neccessarily have to hide the VIP (see below).
> can the client route to the realserver network if it is on a different
class
> C from the directors
> VIP?
it's the VIP on the realservers that's the problem.
>
> also -- the 5 Realservers are K2-550's... each one will handle 5Mbits.
> the director is a Cel-500 -- is this enough power to handle the incoming
> traffic that will be re-routed? I plan to use the TUNNEL method, not the
> DR one...
You don't have to hide the VIP on the realservers if you use the router
to prevent arps for the VIP getting to the realservers. For VS-TUN this
is called Lars' method in the HOWTO.
Joe
--
Joseph Mack mack@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
