LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: LVS vs Piranha

To: Keith Barrett <kbarrett@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LVS vs Piranha
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "David D.W. Downey" <david.downey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 14:42:51 -0500 (CDT)
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Keith Barrett wrote:

> "David D.W. Downey" wrote:
> > 
> > 
> Then I suppose all the other customers, and a great product review on
> ZDnet, had no problems with the product by accident? And I suppose all
> our usage here is imaginary? And our demo at LWE didn't happen? Hummm.
> 

Anyone can get a demo to work if they play with it enough. One review in
favor does not discount the actual problems in the field.



> Forgive me, but I'll continue to believe the product works as documented,
> and ask that if you have specific improvements to send them to me.
> 

I attemtped to which you forthwith refused to listen to.


Nevermind. I will not respond further to this thread as I stated in the
email I just released not 1 minute ago. The problem has been bandaged and
will be allowed to heal. I will not further discuss the problem on this or
any other list. 


I suggest we both let this die as there is alot more involved than what
readers of this list are seeing. As per my agreement with Peter I am
killing this thread.


-- 
David D.W. Downey
Systems Administrator
RHCE, CUA/CLA
Internet Security Specialist
QIXO.com




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>