LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: lvs, squid and efficiency

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: lvs, squid and efficiency
From: Florin Andrei <florin@xxxxxxx>
Date: 20 Mar 2001 13:29:09 -0800
On 20 Mar 2001 17:23:10 +0000, Andrew Veitch wrote:
> On 19 Mar 2001, Florin Andrei wrote:
> > That's great! So, actually, i only need to use persistent port (besides
> > peering proxies). Just like the guys from JANET did.
> 
> FWIW, we don't use persistent connections.  Just a lot of cache digests :-)

But... why? Aren't persistent connections supposed to be more
appropriate for things like HTTP proxies?

-- 
Florin Andrei



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>