|
On 2001-12-06T01:04:42,
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> said:
> Not sure but I see some bad things: even if we use netlink
> for such purposes may be we have to enqueue the packets and to dequeue
> them after the user space has some time to get the decision.
Yes, this is what I feared, because we do not want to block on this.
> The other model is as the current one: the user space defines policy for
> scheduling and loads it to the kernel (-s WLC, for example).
This is not a serious option I fear.
> What policy the user space can propose? Examples?
In this case, it is a rather complex load balancing decision based on constant
feedback from the next tier fed through a neural network and then chosing the
best server.
(You may shot me now; this wasn't my idea, I am just pondering how to
integrate this with LVS)
And besides, the current code is in C++.
Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@xxxxxxx>
--
Perfection is our goal, excellence will be tolerated. -- J. Yahl
pgpfPQEYhcvZ0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
|
