LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

RE: Hardware based load balancers vs LVS

To: <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Hardware based load balancers vs LVS
From: "Doug Schasteen" <dschast@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 08:51:01 -0500
They usually go on ebay for around $2200 - $2300. Or at least that's
what I've found. Nortel Networks makes a competing product called the
Alteon AD3 and it goes for even cheaper on ebay.

- Doug

-----Original Message-----
From: lvs-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:lvs-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Horms
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 11:24 PM
To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Hardware based load balancers vs LVS

On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 03:59:52PM -0500, Doug Schasteen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I was about to purchase a $1800 Dell server to use LVS on when I found
a
> place that sells used FoundryNetworks ServerIron XL's for only $400
> more. I know these things normally retail for $8000 brand new. Does
> anyone have any experience with these types of hardware commercial
load
> balancers? I'm interested in hearing what people think about this
> solution vs. LVS. Is LVS more configurable / powerful? Are the
hardware
> commercial solutions just an expensive way of doing the same thing as
> LVS? Are they better than LVS?
> 
> Let me know your thoughts whether you've used one or not. The Dell
> server comes with a great support / warranty, while the ServerIron is
> used and won't have a warranty. That, and it's still $400 more. But
will
> the ease of use be worth it? Will its special abilities over LVS (if
> they exist) be worth it?

Can you please give me information on where these are available.
At that price I'd like to get some for testing / making sure LVS
is better.

-- 
Horms
        

_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>