LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

RE: simple example

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org " "users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: simple example
From: Daniel Bidwell <bidwell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 14 Jul 2003 16:04:03 -0400
On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 15:22, Peter Mueller wrote:
> > When I telnet to lvs:5000 I see the packet stream enter lvs 
> > and InActConn goes to 1, but lvs never sends packets out to 
> > peter:5000 and the connection to lvs:5000 eventually times 
> > out. /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward is set to 1.
> > 
> > lvs and peter are both on the same class C subnet and from 
> > lvs, I can telnet to peter:5000 and I get the expected 
> > service and results.
> > 
> > I am trying to use direct routing and NOT NAT.
> 
> Good names, I like the peter machine.  LVS is a bit stuffy for a name, maybe
> you should call it greygoose?

That might be something that we could negotiate :-)

> 
> Maybe I missed something, but what have you done on peter to make it know
> what to do with VIP:5000 packets?

Peter:5000 has a simple little app that returns the host name and a
sequence number of the number of times that it has been called.

I can telnet to peter:5000 from lvs/greygoose and it responds correctly.

> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
-- 
Daniel R. Bidwell       |       bidwell@xxxxxxxxxxx
Andrews University      |       Information Technology Services
If two always agree, one of them is unnecessary
"Friends don't let friends do DOS"
"In theory, theory and practice are the same.
In practice, however, they are not."

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>