|
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 06:48:04PM -0800, Ariyo Nugroho wrote:
>
> --- Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 12:38:07AM -0800, Ariyo
> > Nugroho wrote:
> >
> > > I have questions about LVS-DR:
> > >
> > > 1. Is it OK that the director also acts as the
> > > gateway? From my previous setup with LVS-NAT, I'm
> > left
> > > with the director acted as the gateway for the
> > > realservers. And for some reasons, I think I'll
> > keep
> > > using it as the gateway.
> >
> > Generally no.
>
> So, do you think I must separate the gateway from the
> director? OK then.
It can be done with some hacks. Hunt through linuxvirtualserver.org
for more information.
But really, why don't you just use LVS-NAT?
--
Horms
|
