LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: persistance dependencies??

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: persistance dependencies??
From: Jeremy Hansen <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 10:53:13 -0800 (PST)
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Roberto Nibali wrote:

> Hi Joe,
> 
> >>and connections to 208.37.31.234 port 110 and 25 are being refused. 
> > 
> > this means that there is nothing listening on those ports on the machine
> > that the packets are delivered on. Your LVS may not be sending the packets
> > where you think they are being sent.
> 
> We don't really know. It's the most possible thing, but it could be
> 
> o a packet filter rule
> o service dest is unavailable
> o service is not running on RS
> o he's misspelling the IP address
> o network cable unplugged :)

None of these things are the case or it wouldn't work at all, which it 
does as long as I specific the port on the VIP rather then using port 0.

-jeremy

> Also look at his ipvsadm output: there's a Route and a Local which indicates 
> that the director is a RS too. However he never mentioned this, so that's why 
> I 
> asked.
> 
> Best regards,
> Roberto Nibali, ratz
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>