Joe,
I dont honestly know, it was a long time ago when I tried it. Because the MTU
value is negotiated between both sides of the link it appears to work fine if
you set it on each client. It is just a pain if you miss a client out or
re-install one (like I have done). The better solution has to be using a fixed
version of the Kernel.
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Mack [mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 27 May 2004 12:51
To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
Subject: Re: Large HTTP GET/POST timeout
Chris Paul wrote:
> You have to change the mtu value on the end of the IP tunnel that initiates
> the tunnel,
ie, the real server. In this instance, a windows 2000 box.
really. I would have thought you'd have to set it at the director. I'm glad you
straightened me out. Do you know why setting the MTU for the route on the
director
doesn't work?
Thanks
Joe
--
Joseph Mack PhD, High Performance Computing & Scientific Visualization
SAIC, Supporting the EPA Research Triangle Park, NC 919-541-0007
Federal Contact - John B. Smith 919-541-1087 - smith.johnb@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
Berkeley Alexander
Temple House, 25-26 High Street, Lewes, East Sussex, BN7 2SD
Tel 01273 477784, Fax 01273 478994
www.baonline.co.uk
PLEASE NOTE:
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It may not represent the views of Berkeley Alexander. It is intended solely for
the addressees. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorised. If you
are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any
action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be
unlawful. Any unauthorised recipient should advise the sender immediately of
the error in transmission.
|