Re: Large HTTP GET/POST timeout

lvs-users

Re: Large HTTP GET/POST timeout

To:	Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: Large HTTP GET/POST timeout
Cc:	"LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From:	Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 29 May 2004 02:05:33 +0300 (EEST)

        Hello,

On Fri, 28 May 2004, Joseph Mack wrote:

> >        There is no such thing as MTU for ipip.
>
> so what is the MTU doing in the output of `ip addr show dev tunl0`?
>
> I can set it (can't I?). Is the mtu meaningless, ignored, what?

        It is ignored for IPVS traffic, IPVS has its own encapsulation
and uses the route to RIP. IIRC you do not need to configure tunl0
in director.

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Large HTTP GET/POST timeout, Casey Zacek Re: Large HTTP GET/POST timeout, Julian Anastasov Re: Large HTTP GET/POST timeout, Joseph Mack Re: Large HTTP GET/POST timeout, Julian Anastasov Re: Large HTTP GET/POST timeout, Joseph Mack Re: Large HTTP GET/POST timeout, Julian Anastasov <= Re: Large HTTP GET/POST timeout, Joseph Mack Re: Large HTTP GET/POST timeout, Jacob Coby RE: Large HTTP GET/POST timeout, Chris Paul Re: Large HTTP GET/POST timeout, Malcolm Turnbull Re: Large HTTP GET/POST timeout, Joseph Mack RE: Large HTTP GET/POST timeout, Chris Paul Re: Large HTTP GET/POST timeout, Joseph Mack RE: Large HTTP GET/POST timeout, Chris Paul Re: Large HTTP GET/POST timeout, Joseph Mack Re: Large HTTP GET/POST timeout, Julian Anastasov

Previous by Date:	RE: user counts keepalived vs ldirectord?, Peter Mueller
Next by Date:	Poll for LVS components, Allen Pomeroy
Previous by Thread:	Re: Large HTTP GET/POST timeout, Joseph Mack
Next by Thread:	Re: Large HTTP GET/POST timeout, Joseph Mack
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]