lvs-users
|
To: | Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Large HTTP GET/POST timeout |
Cc: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
From: | Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 9 Jun 2004 23:54:34 +0300 (EEST) |
Hello, On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Joseph Mack wrote: > Julian Anastasov wrote: > > > > > It is ignored for IPVS traffic, IPVS has its own encapsulation > > and uses the route to RIP. IIRC you do not need to configure tunl0 > > in director. > > So with regular ipip tunneling (not ipvs) you only need the tunl0 device > on the receiving end? The only reason you need a tunl0 device on the > transmitting > end is to handle the packets that reply? For regular ipip purposes tunl0 can be used both for send and for receive. IPVS simply knows how to create ipip packets without using the ipip code. Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: iptables and LVS, Julian Anastasov |
---|---|
Next by Date: | help for ipvsadm, Liew Toh Seng |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Large HTTP GET/POST timeout, Joseph Mack |
Next by Thread: | ldirectord v 1.88 2004/05/27 05:29:05 fallback problems again, Jonathan Trott |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |