lvs-users
|
To: | Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Large HTTP GET/POST timeout |
Cc: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
From: | Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 09 Jun 2004 08:22:38 -0400 |
Julian Anastasov wrote: > > It is ignored for IPVS traffic, IPVS has its own encapsulation > and uses the route to RIP. IIRC you do not need to configure tunl0 > in director. So with regular ipip tunneling (not ipvs) you only need the tunl0 device on the receiving end? The only reason you need a tunl0 device on the transmitting end is to handle the packets that reply? Thanks Joe -- Joseph Mack PhD, High Performance Computing & Scientific Visualization SAIC, Supporting the EPA Research Triangle Park, NC 919-541-0007 Federal Contact - John B. Smith 919-541-1087 - smith.johnb@xxxxxxx |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: iptables and LVS, Joseph Mack |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: iptables and LVS, Julian Anastasov |
Previous by Thread: | RE: Large HTTP GET/POST timeout, Julian Anastasov |
Next by Thread: | Re: Large HTTP GET/POST timeout, Julian Anastasov |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |