|
Jeremy Kerr wrote:
Hi all,
I tried contacting the maintiner of keepalived to see if there would
be an interest in integrating feedbackd (NECP) support into
keepalived. Never got a response. I don't want to work on something
that would never be accepted into keepalived proper. Passive
monitoring is nice, but active would be better.
So, I'll ask it: would any of you want to see NECP support added to
keepalived?
There were discussions along these lines a while ago - we decided that
it would be the right thing to do, but was put "on the back-burner", as
there doesn't seem to be a whole lot of interest.
What do you guys think? Is there renewed interest in active load
monitoring?
Also, I've moved the feebackd page - it's now at:
http://ozlabs.org/~jk/projects/feedbackd/
The redfish one will still work, but won't be as up-to-date.
Jeremy,
I would be really glad if feedbackd was integrated into keepalived.
I've been using keepalived and feedbackd on my Debian boxes with lots of
success.
I posted a similar message a while ago and nobody answered me.
Thanks.
Sam
|
