Re: [rfc 0/3] IPVS: checksum updates

To: Wensong Zhang <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [rfc 0/3] IPVS: checksum updates
Cc: Julius Volz <juliusv@xxxxxxxxxx>, lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Vince Busam <vbusam@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:45:46 +1000
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 09:07:22PM +0800, Wensong Zhang wrote:
> Simon Horman wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 07:30:52PM +0200, Julius Volz wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 11:30:29AM +0200, Julius Volz wrote:
>>>>> Great, thanks! I have tested TCP+UDP, local+remote clients, v4+v6,
>>>>> NAT+DSR+TUN in all combinations that are expected to be working and
>>>>> found no problems.
>>>> Thanks once again for your testing. I'll send a pull request to Dave in
>>>> the morning.
>>> Thanks very much!
>>> (CC: Wensong)
>>> I guess it would make sense to start hosting the new ipvsadm version
>>> somewhere on soon. It could still
>>> be marked as unstable and saying, "If you intend to use the
>>> experimental IPv6 support for IPVS introduced in kernel 2.6.XX, you
>>> will need this new version of ipvsadm: ...". Also, we can then point
>>> to it in the Kconfig help text in CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6. What do you
>>> think?
>> Yes I agree. It would be good to start hosting tarballs of the
>> new/unstable/experimental version of ipvsadm on
>> Wensong, can we also host some sort of repository for ipvsadm on
>> If not, I guess the next most logical choice
>> would be to use
> Hi Horms and Julius,
> I have created a svn repository for ipvsadm at  
> before, will create the  
> check-in accounts for you right now.

Great. I think that Vince needs an account too, he has done most (all?)
of the relevant work so far.

Simon Horman
  VA Linux Systems Japan K.K., Sydney, Australia Satellite Office
  H:             W:

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>