LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: VS/TUN + Transparent Proxy Success [was Re: Horm's method (REDIRECT

To: Julian Anastasov <uli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: VS/TUN + Transparent Proxy Success [was Re: Horm's method (REDIRECT)]
Cc: Joseph Mack <mack@xxxxxxxxxxx>, lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Wensong Zhang <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 17:37:02 +0800
Hi Julian,

Julian Anastasov wrote:
> 
>         In http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/VS-IPTunneling.html just
> after the 2nd picture there is a statement which must be corrected:
> 
> [
> their tunnel devices are all configured as
> <Virtual IP Address>, like "ifconfig tunl0 <Virtual IP Address>"
> ]
> 
>         There is no such limitation for Linux 2.2
> 

Yeah, there is no such limitation. I will change it to "The VIP may be
configured on the tunnel device; the tunnel device is configured up,
and the VIP can be can be configured on any alias of non-arp device or
the system is configured to redirect packets for VIP to a local
socket." Does it make more sense? :-)

>         At the end of the document the info for Linux 2.2 must be
> updated too: we have more examples for tunnel setup.
> 

OK, I will add more examples in it, and the VS/DR page too.

Thanks,

Wensong

> Regards,
> 
> Julian Anastasov

----------------------------------------------------------------------
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lvs-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: lvs-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>