lvs-users
|
To: | <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: ipvsadm and kernel 2.2.22 and apache load balancing |
From: | "Bjoern Metzdorf" <bm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 24 Oct 2002 11:55:44 +0200 |
> 2.2.19 + ipvs patch or use 2.4.xx" ... I explained that I cannot use 2.4 > for this situation. This is for a customer of mine. Not for my pleasure. Can you try it anyway with 2.4? Perhaps there is something wrong with how you patch the kernel. Why do you need to stick with 2.2? Does you customer need a 2.2 only patch? Perhaps this patch is making trouble in conjunction with lvs? Greetings, Bjoern |
Previous by Date: | Re: ipvsadm and kernel 2.2.22 and apache load balancing, Romeo Benzoni |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: ipvsadm and kernel 2.2.22 and apache load balancing, laurie . baker |
Previous by Thread: | Re: ipvsadm and kernel 2.2.22 and apache load balancing, Marc-Christian Petersen |
Next by Thread: | Re: ipvsadm and kernel 2.2.22 and apache load balancing, Romeo Benzoni |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |