|
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 11:45:22AM +0200, Romeo Benzoni wrote:
> hi
>
> Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> >hi there,
> >
> >so, now went back to 2.2.19 vanilla + ipvs patch for 2.2.19, compiled the
> >right ipvsadm again, and the minimal LVS is still _not_ working.
>
> should also work with 2.4.x
>
> >
> >Say, can anyone of you really help me to get this LVS running?
>
> I propose the following setup:
>
> __________________________
> | |
> | Client 192.168.0.1/24 |
> |__________________________|
> |
> |
> |
> |
> 192.168.0.2/24
> __________________________
> | |
> | Director with LVS NAT |
> |__________________________|
>
> 172.16.0.1/24
> |
> |
> |
> |
> __________________________
> | |
> | RealServer 172.16.0.2/24 |
> |__________________________|
>
> Default gw: 172.16.0.1
>
>
>
> setup of client and realserver should be obvious.
>
> on the director the commands (for telnet) would be:
>
> # ipvsadm -A -t 192.168.0.2:23 -s rr
> # ipvsadm -a -t 192.168.0.2:23 -r 172.16.0.2 -m
> # echo "1" >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
I think that you also need to add an iptables rule so that return
packets from the realservers are demasqueraded.
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -j MASQUERADE -s 172.16.0.2/24
In addition, if you wish to use ftp you will need the ip_vs_ftp kernel
modules installed.
> while having two separted ethernet segment you don't have to worry about
> send/accept icmp redirect like in the mini HOWTO setup.
>
> If you don't have enough hardware you could even do such a setup using
> user-mode-linux.
--
Horms
|
