Re: your mail

[Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>]

        Hello,

On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Joseph Mack wrote:

> >         Currently, IPVS requires the traffic to VIPs to be locally
> > delivered (LOCAL_IN). It means the VIPs should be local IPs or
> > you have to use ip rules selecting table(s) with local route(s).
>
> like transparent proxy?

        IIRC, it does not work for IPVS in 2.4 as it is in DNAT form.

        This is a local route:

ip route add local 0/0 dev lo table XXX

> Joe

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>