|
Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Joseph Mack wrote:
>
> > > Currently, IPVS requires the traffic to VIPs to be locally
> > > delivered (LOCAL_IN). It means the VIPs should be local IPs or
> > > you have to use ip rules selecting table(s) with local route(s).
> >
> > like transparent proxy?
>
> IIRC, it does not work for IPVS in 2.4 as it is in DNAT form.
are you talking about the standard kernel?
there are patches for transparent proxy for 2.4 which make Horms method
work like is did for 2.2
http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.transparent_proxy.html#Balazs
does this make traffic for the VIPs locally delivered?
> This is a local route:
>
> ip route add local 0/0 dev lo table XXX
OK
Joe
--
Joseph Mack PhD, High Performance Computing & Scientific Visualization
SAIC, Supporting the EPA Research Triangle Park, NC 919-541-0007
Federal Contact - John B. Smith 919-541-1087 - smith.johnb@xxxxxxx
|
