LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: NAT cluster....

To: Stephen Rowles <spr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: NAT cluster....
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2000 13:47:40 -0400
Stephen Rowles wrote:
> 
> hi,
> 
> After trying to use Direct Routing on an ATM network I discovered that
> because of the ATM it is not possible to have duplicate MAC addresses for a
> single IP. The cluster will be a telnet / compute cluster which will load
> balance telnet, ftp, and SSH traffic.
> 
> To solve the problem I am proposing the following setup:
<snip>
> I am planning to use NAT LVS with the real servers sending all data back
> via the director to ensure only one MAC address for the cluster VIP.

so you can access the real-servers 2 ways. 

1. via the VS-NAT LVS, by the VIP
2. directly as independant machines, via their own IP

both will work and I see no reason why they can't happen at the same
time. If you are going to have telnet session open for a long time
with an LVS, the director will timeout the tcpip connection after some amount
of inactivity. The timeout can be changed in /proc. Look for a 
message from Julian in the archives about timeout and tcpip. 

The scaling problem with VS-NAT occurs when there are a lot of packets. If the
real-servers are compute nodes, then there will be proportionately
fewer packets being transferred between the client and the director
and you will be just fine.

Joe
-- 
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center, 
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>