LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: NAT cluster....

To: "David D.W. Downey" <david.downey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: NAT cluster....
Cc: Michael McConnell <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ted Pavlic <tpavlic@xxxxxxxxxxx>, lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Keith Barrett <kbarrett@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 14:00:20 -0400
"David D.W. Downey" wrote:
> 
> You have a lot of nerve there Keith.

I have far more nerve that you know, it's controlled by
professionalism.


> Red hat will be dealing with lawyers.

Your issues have nothing to do with me. I don't know you,
never met you, and the majority of your responses here and
in bugzilla have been filled with colorful phrases, threats,
and insults. If you have issues with Red Hat, I encourage
you to call laywers instead of blowing wind or picking a
fight with me. I'm sure they can handle it. If you have
issues with me, then discuss them with me personally.


> I have the right to state what kind of experience
> I've had with an open source piece of code.

No one ever said you didn't. I also have every right to respond
with my opinions and and related facts. There were no insults or
color phrases in my posts.

> I have made no comments about
> my work period with Red Hat, inc. and will not do so as it
> serves neither side any good.

Neither did I. In fact, I never reported that you ever did work
for them, you just did. Your employement was before I joined.
Anyone reading your posts can tell that you are bringing in far
more baggage into your conversations that technical problem
reports.


> Don't make this personal, Kieth. You won't like the outcome.
> 
> Trust me.

No offense, but give me your best shot or shut up. I have nothing
personal against you, and I'd request that you keep it that way.


> RHCE, CUA/CLA

Hummm. Red Hat sucks, but you promote an RHCE.  :-)

-- 

Keith Barrett
Red Hat Inc. HA Team
kbarrett@xxxxxxxxxx


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>