|
Bjoern Metzdorf wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > > fit in a third (or even forth) server to use as director. I read in the
> > > howto chap 15 about localnode, and it says there '(We rarely hear of
> > > anyone using this.)'. Is there a special reason for not many running it
> > > or is it just that ppl generally has more servers?
> >
> > The LocalNode is a good choice, for example, if you have
> > free CPU and memory to run a real service on the director.
>
> We have very good experiences with 2 real-servers, where the first one is
> also the director.
>
That is only 2 physical machines?
> This is especially useful in setups, where you have a low number of requests
> and a high amount of cpu-consumption per request (dynamic website), because
> the lvs-code then just needs very low resources and you can save your money
> for an extra unchallenged director.
how about many requests? does the lvs code consume alot of system
resources? as the server most likely will run rh, is Piranha a good
package? I understand that use an own implementation of hearteat with
lvs.
Will lvs make my webserver too tired?
/Jon
>
> Greets
> Bjoern
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
