|
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 02:24:45PM +0100, Jon Molin wrote:
> Bjoern Metzdorf wrote:
> That is only 2 physical machines?
>
> > This is especially useful in setups, where you have a low number of requests
> > and a high amount of cpu-consumption per request (dynamic website), because
> > the lvs-code then just needs very low resources and you can save your money
> > for an extra unchallenged director.
>
> how about many requests? does the lvs code consume alot of system
> resources? as the server most likely will run rh, is Piranha a good
> package? I understand that use an own implementation of hearteat with
> lvs.
I like Ultra Monkey, but then again I am biased. I'm not sure
if Piranha has the capability to configure what you want to do,
but certaily LVS which lies underneath it can.
> Will lvs make my webserver too tired?
No.
--
Horms
|
