|
Hi,
> > We have very good experiences with 2 real-servers, where the first one
is
> > also the director.
> >
>
> That is only 2 physical machines?
yes
> > This is especially useful in setups, where you have a low number of
requests
> > and a high amount of cpu-consumption per request (dynamic website),
because
> > the lvs-code then just needs very low resources and you can save your
money
> > for an extra unchallenged director.
>
> how about many requests? does the lvs code consume alot of system
> resources? as the server most likely will run rh, is Piranha a good
> package? I understand that use an own implementation of hearteat with
> lvs.
>
> Will lvs make my webserver too tired?
During high peak times, we have over 250 requests per second hitting the VIP
(which is not very much for the lvs-code), and the lvs-code needs nothing in
relation to the webserver cpu-consumption.
Greets
Bjoern
|
